1969 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1969 Abarth OT.
Because 1969 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Abarth OT | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | OT | 2 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1347 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 43 L |
