1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1950 Austin A 40
To start off, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1950 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 1750 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 34 L |