1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste

To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 (187 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (172 Nm @ 4 RPM). This means 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
Make Alfa Romeo Mitsubishi
Model 1750 Celeste
Year Released 1969 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1777 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 131 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.5 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4130 mm 4120 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 46 L 45 L