1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 (167 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 1750 | 102 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |