1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1995 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 625 kg more than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1995 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 1750 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1950 mm |
