1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1997 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1997 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 1750 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2210 mm |