1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
| Model | 1750 | XL6 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
