1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2003 BMW M3
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2003 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | 1750 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 3168 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 342 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 63 L |
