1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 1750 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 117 L |
