1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2008 Toyota Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 1501 kg more than 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 (167 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 2008 Toyota Matrix
Make Alfa Romeo Toyota
Model 1750 Matrix
Year Released 1969 2008
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1779 cc 1799 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 2581 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]