1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2002 Daewoo Kalos

To start off, 2002 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Kalos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (103 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Kalos weights approximately 45 kg more than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (150 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (103 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2002 Daewoo Kalos
Make Alfa Romeo Daewoo
Model Giulia Kalos
Year Released 1969 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1290 cc 1599 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 76 HP 103 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 103 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 79.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 81.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1000 kg 1045 kg
Vehicle Length 4170 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 46 L 65 L