1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2002 Mazda Laputa

To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia weights approximately 250 kg more than 2002 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia (103 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2002 Mazda Laputa
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model Giulia Laputa
Year Released 1969 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1290 cc 657 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 76 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 103 Nm 63 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 68 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 60.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1000 kg 750 kg
Vehicle Length 4170 mm 3400 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 46 L 30 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]