1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2008 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Neon (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (95 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 325 kg more than 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia (190 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (186 Nm). This means 1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2008 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | Giulia | Neon |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 47 L |