1969 Alfa Romeo Junior vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1969 Alfa Romeo Junior is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alfa Romeo Junior | 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Junior | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3690 mm |
