1969 Alpine A vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1969 Alpine A is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,565 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alpine A (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Alpine A weights approximately 350 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | R 360 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |