1969 Alpine A vs. 1962 Austin A 90
To start off, 1969 Alpine A is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 90 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 1962 Austin A 90 | |
| Make | Alpine | Austin |
| Model | A | A 90 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 34 L |
