1969 Alpine A vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1969 Alpine A is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 540 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Alpine | Ford |
| Model | A | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
