1969 Alpine A vs. 1972 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1972 Chrysler Charger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,561 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler Charger (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 710 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 1972 Chrysler Charger | |
| Make | Alpine | Chrysler |
| Model | A | Charger |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 5561 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2680 mm |
