1969 Alpine A vs. 1972 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 1972 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Alpine | NSU |
| Model | A | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 37 L |
