1969 Alpine A vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 362 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 1978 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1969 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |