1969 Alpine A vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1982 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alpine A (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 600 kg more than 1969 Alpine A.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
| Make | Alpine | Daihatsu |
| Model | A | Taft |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2030 mm |
