1969 Alpine A vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1986 Mercury Sable is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Sable weights approximately 670 kg more than 1969 Alpine A.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Alpine | Mercury |
| Model | A | Sable |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
