1969 Alpine A vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 656 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | 626 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |