1969 Alpine A vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | 3 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |