1969 Alpine A vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (161 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 726 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Alpine | Volvo |
Model | A | S40 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 62 L |