1969 Alpine A vs. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A | Uplander |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 95 L |