1969 Alpine A vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Camry weights approximately 470 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A | Camry |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |
