1969 Alpine A vs. 2008 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2008 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A | Suburban |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 5298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 117 L |