1969 Alpine A vs. 2009 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Suburban |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 5298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 117 L |
