1969 Alpine A vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Alpine | Mazda |
| Model | A | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 76 L |
