1969 Alpine A vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,565 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |