1969 Alpine A vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 2268 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | F-250 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2998 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2029 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 115 L |