1969 Alpine A vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1026 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |