1969 Alpine A vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1027 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Alpine A | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Falcon |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1565 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | LPG |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |