1969 Alpine A vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,565 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Alpine A (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1969 Alpine A.
Because 1969 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Alpine | Mazda |
| Model | A | 2 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 1349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 43 L |
