1969 Alpine A vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1969 Alpine A. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1969 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 773 kg more than 1969 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Alpine A | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | ATS |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1565 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 199 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1503 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1418 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |
