1969 AMC AMX vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1969 AMC AMX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP) has 289 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC AMX weights approximately 432 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | AMX | FX |
Year Released | 1969 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |