1969 AMC AMX vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1969 AMC AMX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC AMX weights approximately 372 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 AMC AMX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 1960 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | AMC | Jeep |
Model | AMX | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2060 mm |