1969 AMC AMX vs. 1963 Rover P5
To start off, 1969 AMC AMX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1963 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P5 weights approximately 318 kg more than 1969 AMC AMX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P5. (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 1963 Rover P5 | |
Make | AMC | Rover |
Model | AMX | P5 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 105.8 mm | 77.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 105 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2820 mm |