1969 AMC AMX vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1973 Zastava 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC AMX weights approximately 418 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | AMC | Zastava |
Model | AMX | 1300 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2430 mm |