1969 AMC AMX vs. 2001 Lancia Nea

To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC AMX weights approximately 32 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.

Compare all specifications: