1969 AMC AMX vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC AMX weights approximately 612 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1969 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 AMC AMX | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | AMC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | AMX | eK |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6384 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2350 mm |
