1969 AMC AMX vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 923 kg more than 1969 AMC AMX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | AMX | Econoline |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3510 mm |