1969 AMC AMX vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP) has 246 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1969 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | AMX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |