1969 AMC AMX vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 504 more horse power than 1969 AMC AMX. (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1969 AMC AMX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC AMX weights approximately 322 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 AMC AMX. (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 AMC AMX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 AMC AMX | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | AMC | Lotec |
| Model | AMX | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6384 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 844 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1150 mm |
