1969 AMC AMX vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (263 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 233 kg more than 1969 AMC AMX.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 AMC AMX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (343 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | AMX | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 3599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1402 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2890 mm |