1969 AMC AMX vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (259 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | AMX | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 259 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 105.8 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |