1969 AMC Hornet vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1969 AMC Hornet is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,983 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC Hornet weights approximately 49 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC Hornet | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | AMC | Studebaker |
Model | Hornet | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4983 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1349 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2980 mm |