1969 AMC Hornet vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC Hornet would be higher. At 4,983 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC Hornet (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC Hornet should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC Hornet weights approximately 31 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC Hornet (414 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 AMC Hornet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. 1969 AMC Hornet has automatic transmission and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 AMC Hornet will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1969 AMC Hornet 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Make AMC Chevrolet
Model Hornet Tracker
Year Released 1969 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4983 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 210 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 414 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 95.3 mm 84.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87.4 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1349 kg 1318 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2210 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]