1969 AMC Hornet vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC Hornet would be higher. At 4,983 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC Hornet (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC Hornet should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 AMC Hornet weights approximately 124 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 AMC Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 AMC Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC Hornet (414 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 1969 AMC Hornet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC Hornet | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | AMC | Toyota |
Model | Hornet | Matrix |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4983 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 414 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1349 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2500 mm |